I find myself dealing with this lately and it is hard to avoid it as a Latter-day Saint because of the expectations that fall upon us by mere tradition alone. In a world that paints an idyllic wedding and berates the work that goes behind the scenes, its sanctity has become some of sort comic relief. Here are some examples.
“Marry Me,” Bruno Mars.
It is a beautiful night/ we’re looking for something dumb to do/ who cares, baby/ I think I want to marry you.
I’m a big fan of Bruno Mars and even this song when they did a song and dance number of it on Glee, but when I started singing the song in the shower and realized the words, I was taken aback. The tempo and beat hides the fact that marriage is something frivolous and can be taken care of easy. Waking up the morning after should not include the talk of how it was fun, but now let’s deal with it as if it never happened. The sort of fidelity and deep-rooted trust and confidence in one another is lost. I guess because it is a human contract that it is easy to find ways around it. An annulment here, a divorce there, and a settlement here ought to fix that “dumb” thing we had done while we were inebriated.
“This is not marriage- this is the world’s worst hangover!” from “The One After Vegas,” Friends: Season 6 x 01.
Years before Rachel decided that she needed to come clean about her feelings for Ross and flies to London to tell Ross she loves him. Her presence being the catalyst to the demise of Ross marriage with Emily. Years later, still with unresolved feelings, the duo gets drunk in Las Vegas and marry each other in their inebriated state.
In order to “rectify” the situation they decide to have their marriage annulled leaving Ross with three failed marriages. Signing a contract while not ones self should constitute some sort of legal protection, if only to avoid scenes like these. As Ross shows, it is not that easy. There are people and feelings involved in the process and emotions that cannot be turned on and off like a switch.
My friend posted this on his Facebook wall yesterday which made me think, we should really define marriage!
“The following post has to do with politics.
Why don’t we give civil unions the same rights, benefits and privileges as marriage, but still call it a civil union?
That way, the Republican side gets to keep their marriage and the Democratic side gets to feel like gays are not being denied rights. Marriage is a RELIGIOUS institution, gays and liberals aren’t trying to tear down churches and belief systems, they just want equal treatment for homosexuals. Both sides can win.”
-Dave Keeler
Is it really that easy? Can we really differentiate marriages and civil unions? Marriages are to Republicans as civil unions are to Democrats? Can the wording, this where my legal training kicks in, give the covenant and practice of marriage the sanctity it deserves?
His friend, Ryan Cobb, highlights a good point: to some people there is no difference between personal belief and political reality. Is this true?
The thing about marriages is that it is already hard enough. There are many factors that one must consider before making that choice to be bound with someone legally for the rest of their lives and it must be taken seriously.
General Young Women President Elaine S. Dalton of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, recently spoke to students at BYU-Idaho about the precursor to marriage– dating. I think she describes the key to a more meaningful marriage as she talks about dating, that it is about leaving our comfort zones and doing great things. About dating she says:
Now for my discovery about dating—nothing has changed really. And it’s precisely because you haven’t changed. You see the principle is that the structure is perfectly designed to get the results it gets. Let me illustrate this principle. Take this potato peeler—which you have to be familiar with here in Rexburg! See how it works. It is perfectly designed to get these results! Even this little point is designed perfectly to remove the eyes of the potatoes and look at these results. So in order to get results or dates here on this campus or any campus or anywhere there are young single adults, you have to redesign the structure for the intended results. And of course that means you must determine, and I mean seriously determine just what results you really want—really! So instead of talking to you about marriage and family, I am going to start on a more elementary level. Let’s just focus on getting dates. Dates for the purpose, of course, of finding an eternal companion, but let’s do first things first! Because you certainly can’t marry, and become parents of a beautiful family, unless you actually go on a date (probably a lot of dates). So let’s start there. I am going to suggest a structure change.
Sis Dalton Talk
The thing about marriages isn’t in the name. It isn’t in how we differentiate one from the other. It is in recognizing the sanctity of the union that is blessed by our Creator for the purpose of blessing His earthly family, us, His children. It must follow the structure, not on a whim, not by pressure, but by doing things to get results.
My religion teacher told me that he has learned a lot of people our age and one thing that he noticed that worked is that when we enjoy someones company and continue to do so, then you can talk about marriage and the plans to do so. Marriage is a binding covenant with a Heavenly Father.